Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction
similarity. Units not yet reached asymptote: 0 Goodness of network: 0.61 Calculating the best mappings after 72 cycles. Best mapping of SMART is HUNGRY. 0.70 Best mapping of TALL is FRIENDLY. 0.71 Best mapping of TIMID is FRISKY. 0.54 Best mopping of TOM is BLACKIE. 0.70 Best mapping of STEVE is FIDO. 0.54 Best mopping of BILL is ROVER. 0.71 by ACME for this example. The five sentences correspo...
متن کاملAn Analysis of ACME: The Analogical Constraint Mapping Engine
This paper discusses some pragmatic issues on the analogical constraint mapping engine (ACME), a widely used artificial neural network model for analogical matching employing Grossbergs IAC (interactive Activation and Competition) artificial neural network model. Our analysis beings with an investigation into the use of a Hopfield constraint satisfaction network for image reconstruction. This d...
متن کاملAdaptation as a Selection Constraint On Analogical Mapping
In any given analogy, there are potentially a large number of possible mapping interpretations. One of the key issues in analogy research is how one of these mappings comes to be selected as optimal and used as the basis for the analogical comparison. It is well-established that structural factors, notably systematicity, can act as selection constraints on mapping. The present work tests to see...
متن کاملSystematicity as a Selection Constraint in Analogical Mapping
Analogy is often viewed as a partial similarity match between domains. But not all partial similarities qualify as analogy: There must be some selection of which commonalities count. Three experiments tested a particular selection constraint in analogical mapping, namely, systemoticity. That is, we tested whether a given predicate is more likely to figure in the interpretation of and prediction...
متن کاملThe One-to-One Constraint in Analogical Mapping and Inference
Theories of analogical reasoning have assumed that a 1-to-1 constraint discourages reasoners from mapping a single element in 1 analog to multiple elements in another. Empirical evidence suggests that reasoners sometimes appear to violate the one-to-one constraint when asked to generate mappings, yet virtually never violate it when asked to generate analogical inferences. However, few studies h...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Cognitive Science
سال: 1989
ISSN: 0364-0213
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog1303_1